NASA Space Apps Indonesia | NASA Space Apps Indonesia

Judge Network

Evaluating Ideas With Data, Impact, And Clarity

Judge profiles are categorized by city and evaluation background so teams can understand the perspectives used to review NASA Space Apps Indonesia submissions.

By CityBy Judge Background

judge profiles found

Jakarta

Technology & AI Evaluation

Kevin Halim

Reviews technical clarity, implementation choices, and whether teams can explain how their prototype works in a credible way.

JakartaDKI Jakarta

Technical FeasibilityAI UsePrototype Quality

Bandung

Engineering & Systems

Bima Prakoso

Evaluates solution structure, engineering tradeoffs, and how well teams connect NASA datasets to a functioning concept.

BandungWest Java

ArchitectureReliabilityData Workflow

Surabaya

Business & Impact

Ayunda Lestari

Looks at whether the project solves a meaningful problem, reaches a clear audience, and has practical next steps after the event.

SurabayaEast Java

Impact ModelUser ValueScalability

Yogyakarta

Storytelling & Communication

Nadya Putri

Judges how clearly teams communicate the problem, data, solution, and impact to both technical and non-technical audiences.

YogyakartaSpecial Region of Yogyakarta

NarrativePresentationPublic Understanding

Purwokerto

Science & Open Data

Ardi Wibowo

Assesses how responsibly teams use open data, whether their assumptions are sound, and how evidence supports the solution.

PurwokertoCentral Java

Data RelevanceScientific ReasoningEvidence

Jakarta

Design & User Experience

Salsabila Putri

Reviews usability, interface clarity, visual storytelling, and whether the project experience helps people understand the idea faster.

JakartaDKI Jakarta

UX ClarityVisual SystemAccessibility

Judging Criteria

Review Ideas With Clear, Useful Feedback

Judges help teams understand strengths, risks, data quality, user value, and how to communicate impact.

View Challenges

Judges